BinaryIgor a day ago

Hmm - why would you do that? How much data, if any, can you safe by compressing it as to compared with the classic Base64?

  • Forgret a day ago

    It depends on the data. Base64 adds ~33% overhead, while NUMBASE can be encoded into one large number at once and compressed with Huffman or other algorithms. For some data types this results in fewer extra characters.

a570xyz a day ago

I'm very curious as to how one gets tired of Base64?

  • Forgret a day ago

    Base64 is great and widely used. I just wanted to experiment with a numeric-only representation. NUMBASE encodes everything into a single large number, which can make certain compression schemes like Huffman more efficient and opens up new ways to store or transmit data.